|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Efficacy of Special Versus Regular Class Placement for Exceptional Children: a Meta-Analysis
Conrad Carlberg, Ph.D.
Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory
Kenneth Kavale, Ph.D.
University of California, Riverside
Fifty primary research studies of special versus regular class placement were selected for use in a meta-analysis. Each study provided a measure of Effect Size (ES), defined as the posttreatment difference between special and regular placement means expressed in standard deviation units. ES was used as a dependent variable in order to assess the effects of independent variables such as placement; type of outcome measure; internal validity; and other educational, personological, and methodological variables. Special classes were found to be significantly inferior to regular class placement for students with below average IQs, and significantly superior to regular classes for behaviorally disordered, emotionally disturbed, and learning-disabled children. Other independent variables bore little or no relationship to ES.
The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 14, No. 3,
295-309 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/002246698001400304

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Bouck
Lost in Translation?: Educating Secondary Students With Mild Mental Impairment
Journal of Disability Policy Studies,
January 1, 2007;
18(2):
79 - 87.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Roach and S. N. Elliott
The Influence of Access to General Education Curriculum on Alternate Assessment Performance of Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 2006;
28(2):
181 - 194.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. Edwards, D. L. Patrick, and T. D. Topolski
Quality of Life of Adolescents With Perceived Disabilities
J. Pediatr. Psychol.,
June 1, 2003;
28(4):
233 - 241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Aaron
The Impending Demise of the Discrepancy Formula
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 1997;
67(4):
461 - 502.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Kavale
Meta-Analysis at 20: Retrospect and Prospect
Eval Health Prof,
December 1, 1995;
18(4):
349 - 369.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Brantlinger
High-Income and Low-Income Adolescents' Views of Special Education
Journal of Adolescent Research,
July 1, 1994;
9(3):
384 - 408.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
Successful Mainstreaming in Elementary Science Classes: A Qualitative Study of Three Reputational Cases
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1994;
31(4):
785 - 811.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Soodak and D. M. Podell
Teacher Efficacy and Student Problem as Factors in Special Education Referral
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1993;
27(1):
66 - 81.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Epstein
Improving Services for Students With Serious Emotional Disturbances
NASSP Bulletin,
January 1, 1993;
77(549):
46 - 51.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Scruggs, M. A. Mastropieri, and G. Casto
The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research: Methodology and Validation
Remedial and Special Education,
March 1, 1987;
8(2):
24 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Slavin
Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews
Educational Researcher,
November 1, 1986;
15(9):
5 - 11.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Salend and S. M. Salend
Competencies for Mainstreaming Secondary Level Learning Disabled Students
J Learn Disabil,
February 1, 1986;
19(2):
91 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. CARLBERG, D. W. JOHNSON, R. JOHNSON, G. MARUYAMA, K. KAVALE, C.-L. C. KULIK, J. A. KULIK, R. S. LYSAKOWSKI, S. W. PFLAUM, and H. J. WALBERG
Meta-Analysis in Education: A Reply to Slavin
Educational Researcher,
October 1, 1984;
13(8):
16 - 23.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Polloway
The Integration of Mildly Retarded Students in the Schools: A Historical Review
Remedial and Special Education,
July 1, 1984;
5(4):
18 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Guskin
Problems and Promises of Meta-Analysis in Special Education
Journal of Special Education,
April 1, 1984;
18(1):
73 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. Sindelar and R. J. Wilson
The Potential Effects of Meta-Analysis On Special Education Practice
Journal of Special Education,
April 1, 1984;
18(1):
81 - 92.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Lloyd
How Shall We Individualize Instruction--Or Should We?
Remedial and Special Education,
January 1, 1984;
5(1):
7 - 15.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Kavale and G. V. Glass
Meta-Analysis and the Integration of Research in Special Education
J Learn Disabil,
November 1, 1981;
14(9):
531 - 538.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|