Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boe, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boe, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does Teacher Preparation Matter for Beginning Teachers in Either Special or General Education?

Erling E. Boe

University of Pennsylvania, Boe{at}pobox.upenn.edu

Sujie Shin

University of Pennsylvania

Lynne H. Cook

California State University, Dominguez Hills

The current U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) emphasis on the preparation of teachers in content knowledge, and de-emphasis on pedagogy and teaching practicums, constitutes a major issue concerning how best to prepare a sufficient supply of highly qualified teachers. By contrast, federal policy represented by the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) emphasizes both full certification and content knowledge. Our research was based on data from the Schools and Staffing Survey for beginning teachers in both special and general education (separately). Results showed that extensive preparation in pedagogy and practice teaching was more effective than was only some or no preparation in producing beginning teachers who (a) were fully certified, (b) secured in-field teaching assignments, and (c) reported being well prepared to teach subject matter and well prepared with respect to pedagogical skills. Thus, contrary to the USDOE perspective emphasizing preparation in content knowledge, extensive preparation in pedagogy and practice teaching contributed to the attainment of the two key NCLB indicators of a highly qualified teacher: full certification and in-field teaching.

References

  • Boe, E.E., & Cook, L.H. (2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully-certified teachers in special and general education. Exceptional Children, 72, 443—460.
  • Boe, E.E., Cook, L.H., Kaufman, M.J., & Danielson, L. (1996). Special and general education teachers in public schools: Sources of supply in national perspective. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 1—16.
  • Boe, E.E., Shin, S., & Cook, L.H. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter for beginning teachers in either special or general education? (Research Rep. 2005-TSD3). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, Center for Research and Evaluation in Social Policy. (Available at http://www.gse.upenn.edu/cresp/ )
  • Brownell, M.T., Hirsch, E., & Seo, S. (2004). Meeting the demand for highly qualified special education teachers during severe shortages: What should policymakers consider? The Journal of Special Education, 38, 56—61.
  • Brownell, M.T., Ross, D.D., Colon, E.P., & McCallum, C.L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 242—252.
  • Carlson, E., Lee, H., & Schroll, K. (2004). Identifying attributes of high quality special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 350—359.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation on teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 286—302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D.J., Gatlin, S.J., & Heilig, V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher e fectiveness. Retrieved July 13, 2005, from http://www.teachingquality.org/resources/topicalindex.htm
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining "highly qualified teachers": What does "scientifically-based research" actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13—25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Feistritzer, C.E. (2005). Alternative teacher certification: A state-by-state analysis 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
  • Finn, C.E., Jr. (1999). Foreword. In M. Kanstoroom & C. E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. v—vii). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
  • Goldhaber, D.D., & Brewer, D.J. (1999). Teacher licensing and student achievement. In M. Kanstoroom & C. E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 83—102). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
  • Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D.C. (2002). The effectiveness of "Teach for America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). Retrieved July 13, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37
  • National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (2003). The NASDTEC manual on the preparation and certification of educational personnel 2003 (8th ed.). Sacramento, CA: School Services of California.
  • National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. Washington, DC: Author.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002)
  • Nougaret, A.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2005). Does teacher education produce better special education teachers? Exceptional Children, 71, 217—229.
  • Paige, R. (2004). Foreword. In U.S. Department of Education, Alternative routes to teacher certification (pp. v—vi). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Rosenberg, M.S., & Sindelar, P.T. (2005). The proliferation of alternative routes to certification in special education: A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 117—127.
  • Seastrom, M.M., Gruber, K.J., Haeke, R., McGrath, D.J., & Cohen, B.A. (2002). Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of out-of-field teaching 1987—88 to 1999—2000 (NCES 2002-603). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Sindelar, P.T., Daunic, A., & Rennells, M.S. (2004). Comparisons of traditionally and alternatively trained teachers. Exceptionality, 12, 209—223.[CrossRef]
  • The Teaching Commission. (2004). Teaching at risk: A call to action. New York: Author.
  • Tourkin, S.C., Pugh, K.W., Fondelier, S.E., Parmer, R.J., Cole, C., Jack-son, B., et al. (2004). 1999—2000 Schools and Sta fing Survey (SASS) data file user's manual (NCES 2004-303). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Improving teacher quality state grants: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Walsh, K. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Baltimore: Abell Foundation.
  • White House. (2002). A quality teacher in every classroom: Improving teacher quality and enhancing the profession. Retrieved May 13, 2002, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/education/teachers
  • Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations: A research report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 41, No. 3, 158-170 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/00224669070410030201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boe, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boe, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?