Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Meeting the Curricular Needs of Academically Low-Achieving Students in Middle Grade Mathematics

John Woodward

University of Puget Sound, woodward{at}ups.edu

Cyrus Brown

University of Puget Sound

An important component of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards is the equity principle: All students should have access to a coherent, challenging mathematics curriculum. Many in the mathematics reform community have maintained that this principle can be achieved through one well-designed curriculum. However, the extant research on equity—which focuses on either ethnic diversity or academic achievement—suggests that this principle is illusive. The current study compares the effectiveness of two curricula in teaching a range of math concepts to 53 (28 male; 25 female) middle school students at risk for special education services in math. The yearlong, quasi-experimental study involved achievement and attitudinal measures. Results indicated that students in the intervention group who used materials designed according to instructional principles described in the special education literature achieved higher academic outcomes ( p < .05, p < .001) and had more positive attitudes toward math (p < .001) than did students in the comparison group.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 40, No. 3, 151-159 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/00224669060400030301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
L. Cook, B. G. Cook, T. J. Landrum, and M. Tankersley
Examining the Role of Group Experimental Research in Establishing Evidenced-Based Practices
Intervention in School and Clinic, November 1, 2008; 44(2): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
C. L. O'Donnell
Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K-12 Curriculum Intervention Research
Review of Educational Research, March 1, 2008; 78(1): 33 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]