This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Glutting, J. J. Articles by McDermott, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Glutting, J. J. Articles by McDermott, P. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Distinctions Without a Difference

The Utility of Observed Versus Latent Factors From the WISC-IV in Estimating Reading and Math Achievement on the WIAT-II

University of Delaware

Marley W. Watkins

Pennsylvania State University

Timothy R. Konold

Curry School of Education, University of Virginia

Paul A. McDermott

University of Pennsylvania

This study employed observed factor index scores as well as latent ability constructs from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition (WISC-IV; Wechsler, 2003) in estimating reading and mathematics achievement on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test—Second Edition (WIAT-II; Wechsler, 2002). Participants were the nationally stratified linking sample (N = 498) of the WISC-IV and WIAT-II. Observed scores from the WISC-IV were analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Although the factor index scores provided a statistically significant increment over the Full Scale IQ, the size of the improvement was too small to be of clinical utility. Observed WISC-IV subtest scores were also subjected to structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses. Subtest scores from the WISC-IV were fit to a general factor (g) and four ability constructs corresponding to factor indexes from the WISC-IV (Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, and Processing Speed). For both reading and mathematics, only g (.55 and .77, respectively) and Verbal Comprehension (.37 and .17, respectively) were significant influences. Thus, when using observed scores to predict reading and mathematics achievement, it may only be necessary to consider the Full Scale IQ. In contrast, both g and Verbal Comprehension may be required for explanatory research.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 40, No. 2, 103-114 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/00224669060400020101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Bowden, N. Gregg, D. Bandalos, M. Davis, C. Coleman, J. A. Holdnack, and L. G. Weiss Latent Mean and Covariance Differences With Measurement Equivalence in College Students With Developmental Difficulties Versus the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III/Wechsler Memory Scale-III Normative Sample Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2008; 68(4): 621 - 642. [Abstract] [PDF]