Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dale, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dale, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

When Paths Diverge

"Errors of Prediction" From Preschool Test Scores to Later Cognitive and Academic Measures

Philip S. Dale

University of Missouri-Columbia, dalep{at}health.missouri.edu

Paulette E. Mills

Washington State University-Pullman

Kevin N. Cole

Washington Research Institute

Joseph R. Jenkins

University of Washington-Seattle

Long-term follow-up information on children who have participated in early childhood special education (ECSE) has seldom been available. In the present study, the cognitive and academic performance of 171 thirteen-year-old graduates of 2 ECSE curricula is examined. Although preschool cognitive measures continued to predict later performance significantly, there were numerous examples of "errors of prediction," that is, children whose later academic performance was substantially better or worse than predicted on the basis of a regression equation. Six individual and family factors were individually at least moderately associated with outcome status and collectively strongly correlated with status as "improver" or "decreaser": positive temperament, European American ethnicity, male gender, middle income, initial referral for gross motor concerns, and nonreferral for social concerns.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 37, No. 4, 237-248 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/00224669040370040301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?