Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deno, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deno, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement

Stanley L. Deno

University of Minnesota, denox001{at}umn.edu

Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is an approach for assessing the growth of students in basic skills that originated uniquely in special education. A substantial research literature has developed to demonstrate that CBM can be used effectively to gather student performance data to support a wide range of educational decisions. Those decisions include screening to identify, evaluating prereferral interventions, determining eligibility for and placement in remedial and special education programs, formatively evaluating instruction, and evaluating reintegration and inclusion of students in mainstream programs. Beyond those fundamental uses of CBM, recent research has been conducted on using CBM to predict success in high-stakes assessment, to measure growth in content areas in secondary school programs, and to assess growth in early childhood programs. In this article, best practices in CBM are described and empirical support for those practices is identified. Illustrations of the successful uses of CBM to improve educational decision making are provided.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 37, No. 3, 184-192 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00224669030370030801


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
J. Alonzo, D. Basaraba, G. Tindal, and R. S. Carriveau
They Read, but How Well Do They Understand?: An Empirical Look at the Nuances of Measuring Reading Comprehension
Assessment for Effective Intervention, December 1, 2009; 35(1): 34 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
B. Diercks-Gransee, J. W. Weissenburger, C. L. Johnson, and P. Christensen
Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing for High School Students
Remedial and Special Education, November 1, 2009; 30(6): 360 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
R. S. Martinez, K. N. Missall, S. B. Graney, O. T. Aricak, and B. Clarke
Technical Adequacy of Early Numeracy Curriculum-Based Measurement in Kindergarten
Assessment for Effective Intervention, March 1, 2009; 34(2): 116 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
A. D. Roehrig, S. W. Duggar, L. Moats, M. Glover, and B. Mincey
When Teachers Work to Use Progress Monitoring Data to Inform Literacy Instruction: Identifying Potential Supports and Challenges
Remedial and Special Education, November 1, 2008; 29(6): 364 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
B. Kelley, J. L. Hosp, and K. W. Howell
Curriculum-Based Evaluation and Math: An Overview
Assessment for Effective Intervention, September 1, 2008; 33(4): 250 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
T. J. Christ, S. Scullin, A. Tolbize, and C. L. Jiban
Implications of Recent Research: Curriculum-Based Measurement of Math Computation
Assessment for Effective Intervention, September 1, 2008; 33(4): 198 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
J. Tilstra and K. McMaster
Productivity, Fluency, and Grammaticality Measures From Narratives: Potential Indicators of Language Proficiency?
Communication Disorders Quarterly, November 1, 2007; 29(1): 43 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
C. R. Greenwood, J. J. Carta, D. Walker, K. Hughes, and M. Weathers
Preliminary Investigations of the Application of the Early Communication Indicator (ECI) for Infants and Toddlers
Journal of Early Intervention, April 1, 2006; 28(3): 178 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
E. S. Shapiro, M. A. Keller, J. G. Lutz, L. E. Santoro, and J. M. Hintze
Curriculum-Based Measures and Performance on State Assessment and Standardized Tests: Reading and Math Performance in Pennsylvania
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2006; 24(1): 19 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
I. Kaminitz-Berkooz and E. S. Shapiro
The Applicability of Curriculum-Based Measurement to Measure Reading in Hebrew
School Psychology International, October 1, 2005; 26(4): 494 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]