Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jitendra, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Yan Ping Xin
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jitendra, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Yan Ping Xin,
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enhancing Main Idea Comprehension for Students with Learning Problems

The Role of a Summarization Strategy and Self-Monitoring Instruction

Asha K. Jitendra

Lehigh University

Mary Kay Hoppes

Lehigh University

Yan Ping Xin

Lehigh University

This study investigated the effectiveness of a main idea strategy and self-monitoring instructional procedure for improving comprehension of textual material in students with high-incidence (e.g., learning and behavioral) disabilities. Thirty-three middle school students with disabilities were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Students in the experimental condition were trained to identify and generate main idea statements using main idea strategy instruction and a self-monitoring procedure. Results indicated that the instructional procedures led to increased reading comprehension of students in the experimental group on the training measure, which was maintained over time. On near and far transfer measures, the experimental group statistically outperformed students in the control group on posttest and delayed posttest items requiring selection responses. Students in the experimental group maintained strategy usage 6 weeks later on selection type responses on the near transfer measure but, not on the far transfer measure. Implications for practice are discussed.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 34, No. 3, 127-139 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/002246690003400302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
M. S. Edmonds, S. Vaughn, J. Wexler, C. Reutebuch, A. Cable, K. K. Tackett, and J. W. Schnakenberg
A Synthesis of Reading Interventions and Effects on Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Older Struggling Readers
Review of Educational Research, March 1, 2009; 79(1): 262 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]