This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Artiles, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Artiles, A. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Dilemma of Difference

Enriching the Disproportionality Discourse with Theory and Context

University of California, Los Angeles

A critical aspect underlying the disproportionate representation debate is the dilemma of human difference. I briefly describe this dilemma and analyze three unstated assumptions about difference that permeate disproportionality discussions. I also make two critical recommendations. First, we must strengthen the theoretical sophistication of the debate in two ways, by bringing philosophical and ethical perspectives to the analyses and by increasing the breadth of the theoretical paradigms used in inquiry efforts. Second, I recommend that we bring context to our research endeavors by acknowledging that issues related to ethnicity, race, and language background are highly contentious in our society. We must also contextualize research by including the perspectives of investigators and of ethnic minority students. This will allow us to become aware of the culturally situated meanings that we bring to our research endeavors and to appreciate the complexity in the lives of the people who participate in our investigations.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 32, No. 1, 32-36 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/002246699803200105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. B. Kozleski and A. Smith The Complexities of Systems Change in Creating Equity for Students With Disabilities in Urban Schools Urban Education, July 1, 2009; 44(4): 427 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. B. Kozleski, P. Engelbrecht, R. Hess, E. Swart, I. Eloff, M. Oswald, A. Molina, and S. Jain Where Differences Matter: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Family Voice in Special Education Journal of Special Education, May 1, 2008; 42(1): 26 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Dyson and F. Gallannaugh Disproportionality in Special Needs Education in England Journal of Special Education, May 1, 2008; 42(1): 36 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Artiles and A. Bal The Next Generation of Disproportionality Research: Toward a Comparative Model in the Study of Equity in Ability Differences Journal of Special Education, May 1, 2008; 42(1): 4 - 14. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. J. Blanchett Disproportionate Representation of African American Students in Special Education: Acknowledging the Role of White Privilege and Racism Educational Researcher, August 1, 2006; 35(6): 24 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Skrla, J. J. Scheurich, J. Garcia, and G. Nolly Equity Audits: A Practical Leadership Tool for Developing Equitable and Excellent Schools Educational Administration Quarterly, February 1, 2004; 40(1): 133 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Skrla Accountability, Equity, and Complexity Educational Researcher, May 1, 2001; 30(4): 15 - 20. [PDF]

				J. Plasencia-Peinado and J. L. Alvarado Assessing Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Using Curriculum-Based Measurement Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2000; 26(1): 59 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]