Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolery, M.
Right arrow Articles by Griffen, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolery, M.
Right arrow Articles by Griffen, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teaching Chained Tasks in Dyads

Acquisition of Target and Observational Behaviors

Mark Wolery

Mark Woloy, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Early Childhood Intervention Program, 320 East North Ave., Pittsburg, PA 15210.

Melinda Jones Ault

University of Kentucky

David L. Gast

University of Georgia

Patricia Munson Doyle

University of Kentucky

Ann K. Griffen

Fayette County Public Schools

This investigation used a multiple probe design to evaluate the use of a constant time delay procedure in a small group instructional arrangement. Two pairs of two students (i.e., dyads) with moderate mental retardation were taught domestic and vocational chained tasks. Tasks for each dyad were divided so that one student of the dyad was taught the first part of the task, and the other student was taught the second part. Interactions between members of each dyad were specifically prompted so that students delivered both antecedent (i.e., attentional cue) and consequent (i.e., reinforcement) events to their dyad member. Students observed each other learning their respective parts of the task and then were assessed on their ability to perform both parts of the task (i.e., the part taught directly and the part taught to the other member of the dyad). The results indicate that (a) constant time delay was effective in teaching chained tasks in dyads, and (b) all students learned a substantial amount of the tasks that they were not directly taught but that they observed being taught to the other member of their dyad. These findings are discussed in terms of designing effective and efficient instruction for students with moderate handicaps.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 25, No. 2, 198-220 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/002246699102500205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
M. L. Campbell and L. C. Mechling
Small Group Computer-Assisted Instruction With SMART Board Technology: An Investigation of Observational and Incidental Learning of Nontarget Information
Remedial and Special Education, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 47 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]