Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolman, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sensitivity to Causal Cohesion in Stories by Children with Mild Mental Retardation, Children with Learning Disabilities, and Children without Disabilities

Clara Wolman

Clara Wolmun, Center for Children with Chronic Illness and Disability, Box 721, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Harvard Street at East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

This study investigated whether children with mild disabilities, compared with children without disabilities, are sensitive to the causal structure of stories. Participants were 16 children with mild mental retardation, 29 children with learning disabilities, and 37 children without disabilities who were good readers. The Causal Network Model (Trabasso, Secco, & van den Broek, 1984) was adopted to analyze the participants' causal understanding of stories. Two stories were manipulated to obtain cohesive and noncohesive versions. Cohesion was defined as the proportion of statements included in the causal chain, which is a central path that leads from the beginning to the end of a story. Although children with mild disabilities recalled less than children without disabilities, overall, similar patterns of causal understanding were observed in all groups. All groups recalled cohesive story versions better than noncohesive versions. Statements in the causal chain were better recalled and judged as more important than statements not in the causal chain. Statements with more causal connections were better recalled than statements with fewer causal connections.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 25, No. 2, 135-154 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/002246699102500202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
D. V. Hayward, R. B. Gillam, and P. Lien
Retelling a Script-Based Story: Do Children With and Without Language Impairments Focus on Script and Story Elements?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2007; 16(3): 235 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]