Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glutting, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by McDermott, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Glutting, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by McDermott, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Score Structures and Applications of Core Profile Types in the Mccarthy Scales Standardization Sample

Joseph J. Glutting

Joseph J. Glutting, Department of Educational Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.

Paul A. McDermott

Department of Educational Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.

This study reports the development of a normative profile typology for showing what types of score patterns are commonplace in the standardization sample of the McCarthy Scales of Childien's Abilities (McCarthy, 1972). The benefit of such a core profile typology is that it provides necessary contrasts for testing hypotheses that children's profiles are descriptively or clinically unique. Standard scores from the battery's primary scales were grouped according to similar shape and level using sequential minimum-variance cluster analysis with independent replications. A final solution of five core profile types met all formal heuristic and statistical criteria, including (a) satisfactory internal cohesion, (b) external isolation, (c) replicability, and (d) full coverage of the sample. The five core types are described according to their score configurations and by members' age, gender, race, parental education, and family occupation levels. Typological findings for the McCarthy Scales then are related to core profile types identified previously for the three Wechsler scales. Finally, three methods are presented for testing whether a given child's profile is unique in comparison to subjects in the McCarthy Scales standardization sample.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 24, No. 2, 212-232 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/002246699002400209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
E. R. Borsuk, M. W. Watkins, and G. L. Canivez
Long-Term Stability of Membership in a Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) Subtest Core Profile Taxonomy
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2006; 24(1): 52 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
A. M. Holland and P. A. McDermott
Discovering Core Profile Types in the School-Age Standardization Sample of the Differential Ability Scales
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 1996; 14(2): 131 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. J. Glutting, E. A. McGrath, R. W. Kamphaus, and P. A. McDermott
Taxonomy and Validity of Subtest Profiles on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1992; 26(1): 85 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]