| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Conceptual Issues in Research SynthesisWellesley College In its short history meta-analysis has been the object of both high praise and pointed criticism. This paper explores the conceptual bases of the controversy. Meta-analytic and traditional research reviews are compared on 4 dimensions: scientific rigor, detecting small effects, problems of oversimplification, and potential policy impact. It is argued that choice of procedures should be determined by the specific purpose of a review rather than by canon. The author cites the benefits of viewing meta-analysis as a flexible arsenal of quantitative tools rather than a unitary method. Several future goals for the developing science of research synthesis are discussed.
The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 18, No. 1,
27-40 (1984) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
