Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voeltz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donellon, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Voeltz, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donellon, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teacher Decision Making in the Selection of Educational Programming Priorities for Severely Handicapped Children

Luanna M. Voeltz, Ph.D.

University of Hawaii

Ian M. Evans, Ph.D.

University of Hawaii

Kenneth Freedland, M.A.

University of Hawaii

Sally Donellon, M.Ed.

University of Hawaii

Special education teachers of severely handicapped children are expected to identify appropriate educational priorities from among multiple programming needs. While such decisions are initially formulated with parents and other professionals at the Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting, little is known regarding decisions teachers themselves are most likely to make on behalf of handicapped children. Study 1 investigated the relative importance attributed to various reasons for selecting target behaviors by teachers in comparison with ratings of naive subjects and clinical psychology doctoral students. A factor analysis suggested possible decision dimensions reflecting professional education practices. Study 2 presented special education teachers with a simulated but realistic IEP experience in which they were asked to formulate and rank their annual goals and objectives based upon a child's diagnostic and assessment data. The frequency of the child's excess behaviors had significant impact on the nature of identified educational programming priorities, while developmental level did not. Implications for the IEP process and for the quality of school programs for children with multiple behavior problems are emphasized.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, 179-198 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/002246698201600206
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?