Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Idol-Maestas, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Idol-Maestas, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Oral Language Responses of Children With Reading Difficulties

Lorna Idol-Maestas, Ph.D.

University of inois

A significant multivariate difference was found between the oral language performance of 44 children labeled reading disabled in the second, fourth, and sixth grades and 59 children of comparable grades who were attending regular classrooms and were free from reading disorders. The possible effects of sex, grade level, ethnicity, nonverbal problem-solving ability, and socioeconomic status were considered. Sex was a significant factor. Females scored higher on morphological and grammatical/syntactical measures. Male subjects used more different words than did females. The difference in language development was examined by (a) an analysis of the ability to spontaneously use grammatical and syntactical rules of the English language; (b) a comparison of the total number of words used compared with the number of different words; (c) an analysis of the relative proportion of use of various parts of speech; (d) an analysis of the average length of utterances; and (e) the number of verbal prompts necessary to evoke an oral response.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 14, No. 3, 385-404 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/002246698001400311


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. E. Lane and L. Lewandowski
Oral and Written Compositions of Students with and without Learning Disabilities
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 1994; 12(2): 142 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]