Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, F.
Right arrow Articles by Oakland, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, F.
Right arrow Articles by Oakland, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Three-Year Auditory Perception Program for Low-Ses Minority Children

Fern Williams, Ph.D.

University of Texas at Austin

Thomas Oakland, Ph.D.

University of Texas at Austin

This study evaluates the effectiveness of three instructional methods in promoting speech sound discrimination and reading achievement over a 3-year period. Subjects were black and Mexican-American lower-SES children identified as having auditory discrimination disabilities. Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measures were administered at the ends of grades one, two, and three to identify changes in auditory perception and reading achievement. One instructional group received a visual-linguistic reading method plus auditory perception activities (VLA); a second group received a visual-linguistic reading method (VL); and a third group received a phonic reading method (P). The hypothesis that VLA would score higher than (>) VL = P in auditory perception was not confirmed consistently. The hypothesis that VLA > VL > P in reading also was not confirmed consistently. No consistent differences were noted for black or Mexican-Americans or for males or females on measures of auditory perception or reading achievement.

The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 12, No. 3, 331-344 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/002246697801200309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?