Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0022466909344223v1
0022466909344223v2    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M. K.-K.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M. K.-K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Characteristics of and Implications for Students Participating in Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Academic Achievement Standards

Jacqueline Farmer Kearns, Elizabeth Towles-Reeves*, Harold L. Kleinert, Jane O’Regan Kleinert, and Megan Kleine-Kracht Thomas

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ltowles-reeves{at}edCount.com.


   Abstract
Little research has precisely defined the population of students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards (AA-AAAS). Therefore, the purpose of this article is twofold: (a) explicate the findings of a multistate study examining the characteristics of the population of students participating in AA-AAAS, and (b) discuss the implications of those findings for instruction and assessment that move us closer to understanding what these students know and can do.The article discusses the results of our study within and across these seven states, implications for practitioners, and future research directions that should be considered for both instruction and assessment.

First published on September 1, 2009, doi:10.1177/0022466909344223
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 23, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?